According to the PEW Environmental Trust, the top 20 shark fishing nations account for 80% of the world’s annual total reported shark catch. The top 10 shark fishing nations, in order, are: Indonesia, India, Spain, Taiwan, Argentina, Mexico, Pakistan, the United States, Japan, and Malaysia, with Thailand, France, Brazil, Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Portugal, Nigeria, Iran, the United Kingdom, and South Korea following, comprising the top 20 fishing nations. Out of these top shark fishing nations, Indonesia, India, and Spain account for over 35% of the world’s annual total reported shark catch. Many of these countries have enacted legislation banning the practice of shark finning even though they still engage in shark fishing.
Countries from within the European Union, particularly Spain, are the main suppliers of shark fins to China万家彩票官网网址, the world’s largest consumer of fins. Despite the worldwide decline in shark populations, many of these countries do not have any legal mechanisms in place to manage shark fisheries—and those that do tend to rely on weak, incomplete, or poorly enforced laws.
Additionally, many of the countries with shark finning bans do not require that whole carcasses with fins be brought to shore. Instead, a fin-to-carcass ratio, whereby the weight of the fins must not exceed a certain percentage of that of the carcasses, is enforced. Once fins are removed, however, it is nearly impossible to determine what species they were taken from, making enforcement very difficult and allowing fishermen to flout the law and mix and match the bodies and fins of various sharks. The European Union recently strengthened its 2003 shark finning ban by closing the loophole that allowed for sharks to be landed on EU vessels without their fins, as long as they met the fin-to-carcass ratio. Now, no sharks can be landed on board any EU vessel without their fins.
The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) developed the International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks (IPOA-Sharks) in 1999. The Plan, in which participation is voluntary, calls on all fishing nations to assess the status and conservation needs of sharks and directs countries whose fisheries catch sharks to prepare and implement a National Shark Plan (NPOA). Implementation of the IPOA-Sharks has been extremely slow. Although the FAO requested that all Shark Plans be submitted by 2001, less than half of the shark-fishing nations have adopted an NPOA.
In 2010, a Shark Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was adopted by parties to the United Nations Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) to improve the conservation status of migratory sharks listed in Appendices I and II of CMS. The agreement prohibits the practice of shark finning and the landing of unattached fins. The Shark MOU applies to seven shark species—basking, great white, whale, shortfin mako, longfin mako, porbeagle, and the northern hemisphere populations of spiny dogfish. As of May 1, 2014, CMS had
A number of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs) have been established in order for coastal and fishing nations to cooperate in establishing catch limits, combat illegal fishing, and set other fishery management rules. Many RMFOs have banned shark finning, including the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO), South East Atlantic Fisheries Organization (SEAFO), and North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC). These bans, however, are also implemented through a fin-to-carcass ratio and RFMOs routinely fail to protect sharks from unsustainable fishing practices.
While many shark and shark-related populations have faced steep declines due to years of exploitation and international trade, only the basking shark, whale shark, great white shark, porbeagle shark, oceanic whitetip shark, scalloped hammerhead shark, great hammerhead shark, smooth hammerhead shark, two species of manta rays, and seven species of sawfishes are covered by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). The trade in shark fins is driving many shark species to extinction, and AWI continues to work through international conventions such as CITES to gain better protections.
A number of countries, including Argentina, Costa Rica, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Panama, and the United States require that sharks be landed with their fins naturally attached to their bodies to ensure that finning does not occur. Recognizing the need for even stronger protections, some nations have become true champions for sharks; since 2009, an increasing number of countries such as Palau, Honduras and the Maldives have banned shark finning as well as established shark sanctuaries that ban all shark fishing within their territorial waters. Please click here to learn more about the International shark finning bans and policies.
Lastly, many hotels, airlines, and companies have taken conservation into their own hands by establishing company policies that ban the shipment, sale, or promotion of shark fin products. Please click here to learn more.